Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Liar, Liar Pants On Fire

Liar, Liar Pants On Fire



Taliban and Al-Qaida are the creations of the western corporate governments! Without them how could they continue their genocides and crusades with impunity?


After ten years of Israel centric war of resource and geo-political games in Afghanistan they got nothing to show to anyone! On top of these blatant failures, millions of evidence exposing “democratic and humanitarian” war crime and genocides in Afghanistan and Iraq do need diversions like “Taliban flogs and executes pregnant widow”, “Time Cover Shows Mutilated Afghan Woman” by infamous Drudge Report and many other spin doctors as they are their powerful allies!!


Remember, prior to the Fist Gulf Massacre the Hill & Knowlton trained Nurse Nayirah who was the Kuwaiti UN Ambassadors’ daughter and falsely testified that she had witnessed Iraqi soldiers killing hundreds of premature babies at the al-Addan hospital in Kuwait City.[4] …… .


Come on we need these lies like Saddam Hussein's alleged shredder but please do not attack Muslims based on these lies.




Faruque Ahmed

Moderator

Free Australia Now

Mobile: 041 091 4118



Taliban flogs and executes pregnant widow

August 10, 2010 - 1:01PM


The Taliban publicly flogged and then executed a pregnant Afghan widow by shooting her three times in the head for alleged adultery, police said.

Bibi Sanubar, 35, was kept in captivity for three days before she was shot dead in a public trial on Sunday by a local Taliban commander in the Qadis district of the rural western province of Badghis.

The Taliban accused her of having an "illicit affair" that left her pregnant.

She was first punished with 200 lashes in public before being shot, deputy provincial police chief Ghulam Mohammad Sayeedi told AFP on Monday.

"She was shot in the head in public while she was still pregnant," Mr Sayeedi said.

The execution is a grim reminder of the Taliban's harsh six-year rule from 1996 to 2001 in Afghanistan. The radical Islamists staged public stonings or lashings of those found to have committed adultery or sex outside marriage.

The then-Taliban government would also chop off the hands and feet of those accused of theft and robbery.

Local Taliban commander Mohammad Yousuf carried out the execution, Mr Sayeedi said.

The woman's body was dumped in an area under government control.

The man who allegedly had an affair with Ms Sanubar has not been punished.

Head of Badghis provincial council Mohammad Nasir Nazaari confirmed the execution and said the Qadis district was entirely under Taliban control.

The deputy head of the religious council for western Afghanistan, Mohammad Kabaabiani, said the execution ran counter to Islamic principles.

Head of the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission in western Afghanistan, Abdul Qadir Rahimi, condemned the killing.

"Any such trial is unacceptable and is a violation of human rights. All trials must take place in an authorised court observing every single measure of justice," Mr Rahimi said.

Since they were ousted in 2001, the hardline Taliban militants have executed many people they accused of spying for foreign forces, including at least one woman who was shot dead in Kandahar.

The insurgents last year publicly executed a young couple, accused of eloping in Nimroz province, by firing squad in front of a mosque.

AFP

Monday, May 24, 2010

America! An Absolutely Arrogant and Ignorant Undemocratic Country

America! An Absolutely Arrogant and Ignorant Undemocratic Country



Further to Gutless and Hypocrite Hilary Clinton the corporate media is getting mad with Obama to seek new international order and plethora of other propaganda campaign!


These gutless media outlets and US Government are scared to talk about DEAD IN THE WATER and 9/11 of 1967!


They also refuse to talk about Iraq: A War For Israel and Early American Withdrawal from Iraq will Hurt Israel as well as Illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq. One must wonder what kind of parents would send their own children to die for a ‘mistress’ called Israel?


Right now, it becomes must to ask, why is the gutless and hypocrite USA not getting out of Korean Peninsula and allowing the natural re-unification of both Korea like Germany?


Please also examine the so called American Democracy in light of well-known and proven US record of blatant and immoral actions and behaviors! These actions of USA are totally undemocratic, immoral and illogical. It is more than clear and well established fact that the USA had been murdering democracy, fairness and notion of justice for Israel and earned curse and condemnation from almost everyone!


Obama to seek new international order

MICHAEL SHEAR

May 24, 2010

Global leadership ... a West Point cadet salutes Mr Obama

Global leadership ... a West Point cadet salutes Mr Obama Photo: Reuters


WEST POINT: The US President, Barack Obama, pledged to shape an ''international order'' as part of a national security strategy that emphasises his belief in world institutions and America's role in promoting democratic values.


Speaking to the graduating class at the US Military Academy at West Point, he expressed his faith in co-operation and partnerships to confront economic, military and environmental challenges.


''The international order we seek is one that can resolve the challenges of our times,'' Mr Obama said.


''Countering violent extremism and insurgency; stopping the spread of nuclear weapons and securing nuclear materials; combating a changing climate and sustaining global growth; helping countries feed themselves and care for their sick; preventing conflict and healing its wounds.''


The administration is set to release its first national security strategy this week, and Mr Obama's preview at the weekend suggests it will be different from the one offered by his predecessor in 2002. In that document, George W. Bush called for a policy of pre-emptive war and a ''distinctly American internationalism''.


Mr Obama has spoken frequently about shaping new alliances with the world, and of attempts to repair the US image abroad after almost a decade in which Mr Bush's approach was viewed with suspicion in many quarters. In his commencement speech to the graduates, Mr Obama emphasised his beliefs in those alliances.


''Yes, we are clear-eyed about the shortfalls of our international system. But America has not succeeded by stepping outside the currents of international co-operation. We have succeeded by steering those currents in the direction of liberty and justice - so nations thrive by meeting their responsibilities, and face consequences when they don't.''


Mr Obama said the US will pursue a strategy of ''national renewal and global leadership.''


To the men and women in the hall, many of whom are headed to Afghanistan, Mr Obama pledged ''the full support of a proud and grateful nation''.

The Washington Post



Gutless and Hypocrite Hilary Clinton

For more: Crimes Exposed



DEAD IN THE WATER is a documentary based on 9/11 of 1967! This well corroborated documentary was aired in BBC, ABC and many other media outlets despite Zionist pressure. On that time, USA was very close to a nuclear war because of the rogue and dangerous Israel!


This brilliant documentary also clearly demonstrates Israeli power and influence over USA! Even after 43 years, the US government is scared to tell the truth to it’s people and comfort the dead and injured sailors of USS Liberty.


Clinton failed to compel Israel to stop Illegal settlement in the occupied Palestine. Even Israel told Obama to shut up!


Now gutless Clinton telling North Korea about “consequences”, “international law”, … ! However, like a pussy cat she says nothing to Israel!


Now, do we have to believe in this pussy cat Hilary and her ballet dance?


Gutless Hilary


The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, will explore options for censuring North Korea over the sinking of a South Korean warship with the Chinese government early next week.


Clinton, who is due to arrive in Beijing on Sunday for a three-day visit, said on a stop-over in Tokyo that North Korea will face consequences.


She added: "We cannot allow this attack on South Korea to go unanswered by the international community,"


The options available to the US and South Korea are limited, especially as the Chinese are reluctant to join in any action against their ally North Korea. Beijing has described the incident only as unfortunate and urged all parties to show restraint.

For more: Hillary Clinton warns North Korea

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Faruque Ahmed’s Communication with the ACMA

Faruque Ahmed
PO Box 349, ALEXANDRIA NSW 2015
Mobile: 041 091 4118
Email: union_faruque@yahoo.com.au



Ms. Eileen Haley
Assistant Manager, Investigation Section
Australian Communications and Media Authority
Level 15, Tower 1, Darling Park, 201 Sussex Street
T +61 2 9334 7700, 1800 226 667, F +61 2 9334 7799
www.acma.gov.au

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Your file reference: ACMA2009/8 C19648

Dear Ms. Haley

I have followed your advice and I have written to the 2UE station manager as required by the law. It appears to me, the station manger is more prejudicial than Jim Ball of that establishment! May be it is the station policy to incite against the Muslims and the Arabs based on obscure, false and fabricated information as well as not to report anything regarding Islam and the Arabs truthfully and accurately!!

Point of Contention # 1

Jim Ball of radio 2UE allowed a male caller to claim, “…it is written in Qur-an that the Jews are the children of apes and pigs …”, this was at approximately 12.37 am, 12th of August 2009 (and I am paraphrasing). Jim also agreed with him. He did so with excitement and he made further comments which added more fuel to the fire, he said, “That’s right, it is written in the Qur-an …” (.and again I am paraphrasing).

I then managed to contact his producer and with some difficulty. I then requested him to pass my message to Jim that:
1. He must let me know in which part of the Qur-an it says, “The Jews are children of apes and pigs”?
2. Should he fail to broadcast the source mentioned above, that he claimed was drawn from the Qur-an, then he must broadcast an apology for inciting hate against Muslims of many ethnic backgrounds, which includes myself.

Jim Ball neither told us in which part of Qur-an it is written, nor did he apologise for his ill-motivated and deliberate misquoting of Qur-an, which I believe is carefully calculated to incite against Muslims. Now his station manger is saying, “ …. I anticipate that there may be more than one interpretation of the content or meaning of those texts … “. Clearly, the station manager is supporting Jim Ball’s original stand with more anti-Islamic zeal. Yet, with extreme arrogance he did not bother to include one iota of evidence in support of his claim!

I therefore demand that the Radio 2UE and Jim Ball must quote the Qur-anic reference in support of their original and current claims. Failure to do so must attract a proper and meaningful deterrent from the ACMA.

The station manger also said, “I do not believe that Mr Ball's comments evoked such a strong reaction as hatred or contempt towards people of Muslim faith.” Again, it is not true.

Jim Ball has been using this trick to improve his ratings and to hurt Muslims and the Arabs for a long time. Upon request I will produce dozens of evidences in support of my claim. One school of thought also suggests that Jim Ball’s illegal and irrational anti-Muslim and anti-Arab style and his ability to get away with murder is one of the reasons behind hiring him by the radio 2UE in the first place. Please remember, the 2UE is the lowest ranking station now. You see Jim Ball’s counter broadcaster Stuart Boking used to work in Jim’s current slot. Poor Stuart used to receive phone calls and at the same time he used to talk on air unlike Jim Ball while he used to work in the 2GB! Jim Ball used to have all of the support team. Surprisingly, when Jim Ball joined at the 2UE, he found the support team unlike poor Stuart Boking who is much more professional, dedicated and decent than Jim Ball!

Obviously, all of the above suggest, Jim Ball is a favored person with an agenda! I am sure a proper inquiry can reveal those agenda items.

Point of Contention # 2

The station manger also said, “However, it certainly was not the aim of the program to incite hatred against Muslims or to generate disrespect towards the Muslim faith”. This statement is a blatant lie. I know for sure, Jim Ball have been inciting against the Muslims and Arabs for a long time. Again, I am willing to provide Jim Ball hate files for a proper examination.

Point of Contention # 3

The station manager wrote, “I cannot see how it could reflect badly on Muslims even if they did ask Bob Hawke to prevent Australian soldiers from wearing uniforms at home”. Really?! Is it true? Are you telling me that this false quote is not sufficient enough to incite against the Arabs and Muslims?

Point of Contention # 4

The 2UE station manager wrote, “If for example you are listening to Mr Ball's program and disagree with any of the sentiments expressed on air, I encourage you to call in to express a differing point of view". It is a proven lie! Jim Ball of 2UE or even formerly 2GB hardly provide air time to any dissenting voice. Manufacturing consent and opinion to incite against the Aboriginals, Arabs, Muslims and migrants is a Jim Ball trade mark. Generally speaking, after his deliberate and often prejudiced presentation, I have not heard many opposing views in Jim’s program.

In my case, Jim used to praise me. Even he said on air that his wife like my view points. However, since I went on to expose many Israeli wrong doings, he turned against me and Jim stopped giving me air time all together. Jim Ball has presented many false and fabricated version of Arab/Palestine conflict. Like a few people, I have attempted to correct him on those issues but he refused to give me any chance. Ironically, he gave me the right to call him “Mother Fucker” instead of debating with me!

Point of Contention # 5

“Unfortunately, time constraints do not allow us to put every caller to air. Radio 2UE endeavours to give as many listeners as possible the opportunity to express their views to a radio audience” of the 2UE manager is far from the truth. In many occasions the 2UE airtime was unused and some good people that I know managed to ring Jim Ball and they politely told him to tone down his rhetoric. Jim did cut them off instead of debating with them seriously. Upon requirement many of them are willing to testify to clear the air in this regard.
Point of Contention # 6

Again “It was never Mr Ball's intention to offend anyone of any race or religion” is a total lie. Jim Ball has been insulting Aboriginals, Arabs, Muslims and migrants with his famous (or infamous?) tricks and techniques. His websites are even worse! A careful examination of his webs will reveal more of his prejudice and bigotry. Even the famous Media Watch of the ABC is sick and tired of the Jim Ball filth!

Point of Contention # 7

“After careful review of the Broadcast, I feel sure that there was not a breach of the Code.” is nothing but a slap in the face of fairness, justice, decency, commonsense and any law I can think of including the, “…a broadcast that constitutes religious vilification within the meaning of the Code.”

Point of Contention # 8

“Radio 2UE endeavours to give as many listeners as possible the opportunity to express their views to a radio audience …” written by the 2UE Station Manager! It is unbelievable and untrue!!

I have been talking to Mr. John Carr of 2UE for a long time. I find him a reasonable person too. Since I made this complaint, Sunday morning, 20th of September 2009 (or may be the day before) I made a few attempts to talk to him. Three of my mobile calls were rejected, three more of my calls were put on hold to cost me money and the seventh one was responded with a laughter by a person (may be known to me) by saying, “Faruque I‘ll call you back if I can”. Eventually no one called me on that night! I am sure John won’t do this to me or many 2UE staffs won’t practice this type of cruelty unless they are instructed or forced by people in the higher echelon of that organisation.

I am sure, a proper Inquiry is the only way to go forward and I request you to do so at your earliest convenience. Should you require any further materials in this regard please feel free to call or write to me at your earliest opportunity.

With thanks.

Sincerely Yours




Faruque Ahmed

Radio 2UE Response to Faruque Ahmed

Radio2UE Pty Limited
ABN 93 000 796 887
Sydney, Level11170 pacific Highway, Greenwich
New South Wales 2065

PO Box 954, St Leonards, New South Wales 1590
www.2ue.com.au
Telephone 0299309954 Facsimile 02 9930 9479
9 September 2009


Mr Faruque Ahmed
PO Box 349
Alexandria NSW 2A15

Dear Mr. Ahmed,

Radio 2UE Overnight program - 12 August 2009

Thank you for your letter of 20 August 2009.

First of all, allow me to apologise that you were offended by comments made on 2UE's overnight program on 12 August 2009 (the "Broadcast"). Radio 2UE certainly does not set out to offend its listeners or members of the Muslim community.

I have investigated your concerns about the Broadcast. In doing so, I forwarded your correspondence on to Mr Ball, the presenter of 2UE's Overnight program, and discussed your concerns with him. I have also considered section 1.3(e) of the Commercial Radio Codes of Conduct ("Code") in respect to ethnic and religious vilification.

Section 1.3(e) of the Code provides that a licensee must not broadcast a program which is "likely to incite or perpetuate hatred against or vilify any person or group on the basis of age, ethnicity, nationality, race, gender, sexual preference, religion or physical or mental disability". This test in the Code sets a high threshold for the likely effect of prohibited behaviour that is that comments must induce a strong reaction of contempt or ridicule against a group of people to be regarded as I breach under section 1.3(e).

With all due respect, I do not believe that Mr Ball's comments evoked such a strong reaction as hatred or contempt towards people of Muslim faith. Mr Ball and his caller very briefly mentioned the Qur-an in the context of a discussion on television. As with any religious texts, I anticipate that there may be more than one interpretation of the content or meaning of those texts. Clearly you disagree with his view. However, it certainly was not the aim of the program to incite hatred against Muslims or to generate disrespect towards the Muslim faith. Furthermore, I cannot see how it could reflect badly on Muslims even if they did ask Bob Hawke to prevent Australian soldiers from wearing uniforms at home. Therefore, I do not believe that listeners would feel such severe emotions as hatred or contempt for Muslims as a result of this broadcast.

As you know, Radio 2UE operates a talkback radio format. I am sorry to hear that your friend did not get on to the program that night. Unfortunately, time constraints do not allow us to put every caller to air. Radio 2UE endeavours to give as many listeners as possible the opportunity to express their views to a radio audience. If for example you are listening to Mr Ball's program and disagree with any of the sentiments expressed on air, I encourage you to call in to express a differing point of view".

It was never Mr Ball's intention to offend anyone of any race or religion. I do however understand your point of view and the reasons why you wrote to us. The theme of the Broadcast was complex, and of a nature that generates different opinions. While Radio 2UE wishes never to offend any of its listeners, when some complicated topics are discussed, unfortunately, this can happen. lt is my understanding however that there is a significant difference between a broadcast that results in some finding offence and a broadcast that constitutes religious vilification within the meaning of the Code.

After careful review of the Broadcast, I feel sure that there was not a breach of the Code.

Radio 2UE values its listeners and their feedback. On behalf of the station and Mr Ball, I apologise for any offence caused by the Broadcast. Radio 2UE certainly does not set out to offend its listeners or any members of the community.

I hope that the above information addresses your concerns,

In accordance with the Commercial Radio Codes of Practice, I am required to advise you that in the event you are not satisfied with this response you have the right to refer the matter to the Australian Communications & Media Authority.

Yours sincerely



Greg Byrnes
Program Director